One of the leading retail websites has released some interesting figures this week and made some even more interesting comments. According to the figures for website lettingaproperty.com there site refers tenants that fall into these categories. 77% are in full-time employment, 4% are part-time employed, 4% self-employed, 1% students and 14% are unemployed.

The interesting comments regarding this data were made by Jonathan Daines, founder of the website when he said

 “I am pleased that the site generates quality leads for Landlords and Agents from employed tenants; however I am concerned that landlords may be missing an opportunity if they do not at least consider tenants claiming income support or LHA.The most common reason given by landlords is due to a poor experience that they have had in the past with their local councils and rent payments.”

He goes on to add that in his opinion that particular landscape has changed dramatically recently. He says that local councils are now more aware than ever that they need to get proactive when it comes to these issues.

Most councils now will entertain the idea of requests for rent to be paid directly to the landlord, despite recent changes in the LHA that allowed for it to go to the tenant. This is very good news indeed for those of us that would like to take the opportunity of renting to those that are on LHA so long as we can rely on being paid.

People have grabbed the government offer of £400 pounds towards the replacement of their old boiler with both hands. A total of 44% of the available vouchers have already been issued, but there is still an opportunity for some 70,000 residential property owners to claim theirs if they are eligible.

According to Gordon Brown the boiler scrap-age scheme should lower the bills of the home owners as well as helping the government towards its targets of reducing carbon emissions. On top of that it has the added bonus of creating work in a time where it is really needed.

The offer is open to those residential landlords that qualify and many have taken the opportunity up. Some, though,  think it ought to be extended further to include social landlords and I lend my support to that. I see no reason why they should be excluded.

Others are pointing out that the vouchers are working but that actually more could be done. Given that 3.5 million homes are believed to have inefficient boilers the 70 000 vouchers on offer are unlikely to address the whole problem.

One thing to note though if you are in the market for a new voucher is that some companies have offered to match the governments £400 offer. that may well be worth looking into of you have a large portfolio.

Figures this week have emphasised just how important the buy to let sector is to Britain at the moment. This does not look set to change in the near future either. Apparently the actual stats are that nearly two thirds of British tenants have looked into purchasing their own property and found that it was not an affordable option.

Without making too much of a comment on what that says about the state of the economy, it makes it crystal clear how much this country is relying on its buy to let landlords to provide accommodation for its citizens. And it looks like being a long term thing.

Approximately 55 percent of tenant respondents expected to rent for the remainder of the year and for as long as three more years according to Rightmove’s first Consumer Confidence survey for 2010. Nearly one third of all tenants (31 percent) anticipated renting for more than three years.

In a very interesting turn of phrase Rightmove noted that the results of the current survey indicate that 2010 may very well be the “Year of the Landlord.”

Let’s hope that government acknowledges the importance of our sector with some key reforms in the very near future. 

Further to last week’s blog on green real estate it appears that now we are introducing green leases. An interesting sounding idea, indeed.

It seems that in April a new scheme will be introduced wherein the tenant and the landlord sign a contract agreeing to take measures to reduce the a given building’s carbon emissions, make the property more energy efficient and reduce waste. To begin with these green leases will only be seen in the largest commercial properties but the government has pledged that if they are successful we will soon see them rolled out across the rental sector including residential properties.

They also pledge that the scheme will be revenue neutral. Landlords that go over a certain carbon emission will have to buy vouchers to cover it and that money will then be re distributed to those that are doing the most to try to improve their efficiency.

On the face of it this sounds great but I am puzzled as to where the tenants come into it. Surely if they are not the ones faced with having to get vouchers to pay for the emissions then they have no incentive to keep them low? There is some indication that landlords will draw up contracts with in built penalties for tenants that do make an effort to remain energy efficient. Thats sounds fair enough but somehow I see that line of making an effort becoming very ‘blurred’.

Last week the government followed through on one of its promises regarding the property sector though landlords could probably have thought of a couple they would rather have seen come first. As they said they would the government have introduced an initiative that allows tenants to post their feedback about their landlords on a new online forum.

As well as this and actually far less worryingly they have also given tenant the option of contacting a hotline to get advice on any problems they may be having.

The hotline does not concern me, advice and education are always a good thing and this is no exception. A place to rank landlords and fairly much put your personal spin on everything to do with your relationship with your landlord, is not a good idea.

Most of you will have heard of sites that allow people to rank hotel and motels and air their grievances. Plenty of you probably think they are a good thing but I have friends in the hotel/motel industry and have seen vindictive customers impugn the reputation of decent people just because they did not get exactly what they want. Not matter how unreasonable the request was.

Granted this initiative is not to be privately run and one can only hope that means that it will not be the free for all libel fest that the hospitality sites have become. However I have my doubts. I hope to goodness that the fact that this is people’s livelihood we are dealing with here, is taken fully into account.

We shall watch with interest. 

Recent findings by the ARLA Association of Residential Landlords seem to be giving the depressing message that hopes of declining tenant arrears may have been a little premature. It now appears that British landlords are continuing to really struggle with tenants who cannot meet their rental commitments.

55% of the landlords that the ARLA surveyed indicated that one or more of their tenants were currently in some way behind on their payments.

ARLA’s Ian Potter rightly calls this figure a cause for concern.

He notes also that this rental arrears situation has close links to the high level of unemployment we are currently experiencing. And as almost all indicators are signaling that unemployment is set to rise over the next year, respite does not seem likely.

Even though demand for rental accommodation is high at the moment, indebtedness is a problem for a lot of tenants. The worrying trend we discussed earlier in the month, of paying rent with credit cards, is hardly likely to make this situation any better. We have to prepare ourselves for the fact that rental arrears may get worse before they get better.

Potter refers to it as a web of debt and that seems an apt description. Let’s hope that the predicted rise in unemployment does not eventuate as that seems to be our best hope of avoiding arrears spiraling out of control.

According to Paragon Mortgages fewer landlords are employing the services of a financial advisor in order to remortgage. In the last three months of 2009 only 30% of landlords used this particular service, a drop of nine percent from the previous three months figure.

Mainly this is down to an overall reduction in people remortgaging at all. Those who know at Paragon are predicting that this is a trend that will continue for a simple reason. The reversion rate is often, at the moment, more beneficial than the any of the rates available on the few remortgage packages open to landlords.

Until there is some signs of life in the area of buy to let lending very few landlord’s are going to be motivated to take the time. There is a desperate need for fresh and competitive loan options to be available to landlords.

As I stated last week there are some hopeful signs with those landlords with great credit histories looking to expand already successful portfolios being offered some excellent products. That is not enough to ensure the the sector will reach its full potential though.There needs to be a rapid expansion of the types of deals being offered all landlords including those that wish to get involved in this business for the first time.

We have discussed on here before the important role the BTL sector is going to play in ensuring that their is adequate housing for the population over the next few years. The banks need to acknowledge that and get on board.

Regulation seems to be the call for the buy to let industry at the moment but a recent statement from the CML indicates that they feel that credit flow is the answer to our problems not the increase of regulation.

This statement has been prompted by figures showing that new buy to let lending had increased for the second consecutive quarter in the last three months of 2009. There were 25,800 new loans advanced, up from 23,700 in the previous quarter.

The head of the NLA or national landlords association seems to think that other recent figures showing the the decline in both repossessions and mortgage arrears showed that the BTL sector was far more robust than it was being given credit for. He says that this indicates that all the talk of regulation is a bit over the top and urges the government to have another think before they put wholesale changes in place.

He adds: “Rather than wasting effort on further legislation they should be encouraging lenders to get credit flowing again.”

I am rather in two minds about this. Some regulation may not be a bad think and may in fact take some pressure away from landlord’s by giving them a solid set of guidelines to follow. On the other hand over regulation can be a nightmare. And clearly i agree one hundred percent with Mr Gordon’s statement regarding lenders getting cash flowing into the market again.